Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77314 (KAR)

SRI. R. VENKATRAMA NAIK v. THE NATIONAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/12374/2022 · 2025-09-03

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34509 WP No. 12374 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 12374 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. R. VENKATRAMA NAIK S/O. SRI. R.NARAYANA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.81, NAGARBHAVI II STAGE, VIII BLOCK, 60 FEET MAIN ROAD, MALAGALA, BENGALURU-560072. 2. SMT. R.RADHIKA NAIK W/O. SRI. R. VENKATRAMA NAIK AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.81, NAGARBHAVI II STAGE, VIII BLOCK, 60 FEET MAIN ROAD, MALAGALA, BENGALURU-560072. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ARVIND PATIL B. AND SRI. G. SANJAY, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR BRANCH NO.134, IV PHASE, BEML LAYOUT, KANAKADASA CIRCLE, NEHRU ROAD, RAJA RAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560098 REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 2. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ADMN. OFFICE AT NO.73/1, GANDHI BAZAAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 004 Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34509 WP No. 12374 of 2022 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND BABU J., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE ACTION ON THE PART OF THE RESPONDENT-BANK IN TAKING PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THEIR A AND B PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREUNDER IS HIGHLY ARBITRARY CAPRICIOUS WHIMSICAL AND CONTRARY TO THE SCHEME OF THE MASTER CIRCULAR OF THE RBI AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 has filed a memo stating therein that the petitioners had cleared the loan and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous and seeks to dismiss the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70