Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7731 (KAR)

CHANDLINGAPPA S/O BASAPPA MURADI v. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

MFA/100584/2023 · 2025-02-13

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100584 OF 2023 (MV-I) BETWEEN 1 . CHANDLINGAPPA S/O. BASAPPA MURADI AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.H.NO.6/A, KATAGIHALLI, HIRE VADDARKAL TQ. YELABURGA, DIST. KOPPAL ... APPELLANT (By SRI : D L LADKHAN) AND 1 . ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., 315 ARENJA CORNER, B WING 3RD FLOOR, SECTOR 17, VASHI NAVI MUMBAI-400709 POLICY NO.VOC0028578000100 2 . K.MUKKALAPPA S/O. HANAMANTHAPPA OCC. DRIVER OF TRACTOR BEARING REG. CAMP. NO.KA-37/TA-3551 R/O. HANUCHINAL CAMP TQ. GANGAVATHI, DIST. KOPPAL 3 . SHIVAMMA W/O. LATE KANAKAPPA POLICER AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD R/O. KATAGIHALLI, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL 4 . BHIMAMMA D/O. LATE KANAKAPPA POLICER AGE. 8 YEARS, OCC. MINOR R/O. KATAGIHALLI, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL 5 . BHAGYALAXMI D/O. LATE KANAKAPPA POLICER AGE. 6 YEARS, OCC. MINOR 2 R/O. KATAGIHALLI, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL 6 . PARUSHARAM S/O. LATE KANAKAPPA POLICER AGE. 4 YEARS, OCC. MINOR RESPONDENT NO.4 TO 6 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.3 HEREIN R/O. KATAGIHALLI, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL 7 . HANUMANTHA S/O. LATE KANAKAPPA POLICER AGE. 60 YEARS, R/O. KATAGIHALLI, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL 8 . HANUMAMMA W/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA POLICER AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. MAJOR R/O. KATAGIHALLI, TQ. YELBURGA, DIST. KOPPAL, ... RESPONDENT ******** This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 06.01.2016 passed in MVC No.20/2010 on the file of The Senior Civil Judge, And Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Yelburga. This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Three weeks time is granted to comply with the of office objections. Failing to do so, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE 3 //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 08.04.2025, the Advocate for appellants has not complied the office objections. Hence, this MFA No. 100584 of 2023 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 13.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: vg C By: sdp