Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27853 RPFC No. 15 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 15 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
ROOPA M.
W/O CHANDRASHEKAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, JAIPURA MAIN ROAD, TUMKUR-572 105. …PETITIONER
(BY SMT. A MANJULA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
CHANDRASHEKAR S/O RAJANNA, POLICE CONSTABLE (ACP 1553) HINDU, WORKING AT ASSISTANT POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE, CAR CENTRAL MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 026. …RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., PRAYING TO (I) CALL FOR RCORDS IN C.MISC.NO.123/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU; (II) ENHANCE AWARDING AMOUNT, IN C.MISC.NO.123/2015 JUDGMENT DATED 23.11.2016 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27853 RPFC No. 15 of 2019
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER Right from 2019, steps are not taken for issuance of notice to the respondent. The impugned order is passed on 23.11.2016 and the RPFC is filed in the year 2019.
2. As there was no representation on the last occasion i.e., 18.7.2025, the matter is listed today for 'dismissal'.
3. Today also, there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4