APHC010079312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 457/2025 Between: 1. GAMPALA GOPALAMMA, W/O ABBAYYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 2. DUNNUTALA NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O PENCHAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 3. VARIKUNTA LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O VARIKUNTA SANTAIAH. AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 4. PIDUGU CHINNAPAREDDY,, S/O KONDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. 5. GAMPALA VENKATAMMA,, W/O YELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 6. VAIKKUNTA PENCHALAMMA,, W/O POTTEIAH, AGED ABOUT50 YEARS. 7. VARIKUNTA TIRUPAYYA,, S/O GOPAYYA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 8. GAMOALA AYYAVARAYYA,, S/O CHINNA YELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 9. DUNNUTALA NARASA REDDY, S/O RAMA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT40 YEARS 10. KASI REDDY LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2 11. MADDELA OBULESU,, S/O. OBULAYYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 12. VADIYARAPU SUBBAIAH,, S/O PENCHAILAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 13. .MADDALA AYYAVARAYYA,, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 14. CHERUVUPALLE SRINIVASULU,, S/O. VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 15. SAGILI SUSILAMMA,, W/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 16. CHERUVUPALLE SUBBAMMA,, W/O. RAMANAYYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 17. PANDIKAYALA RAJENDRA KISHORE,, S/O. NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 18. PACHIPINDI VENKATA SUBBAIAH,, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH ,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 19. KUNDAMALURU MALLESU,, S/O. CHINNAMALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 20. VADIYARAPU LAKSHAMMA,, W/O PENCHALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 21. LTTA ESWARAMMA,, W/O. AYAVARAYYA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 22. MADDELA VENKATAMMA,, W/O.GANGAYYA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 23. LTTA MUNNAIAH,, S/O. CHINNAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 24. MADDELA TIRUPAALU,, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 25. LTTA MALLIKHARJUNA,, S/O. MUNEYYA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 26. PANDIKAYALA YELLAMMA,, W/O. PENCHALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 27. ETTA ESWARAYYA,, S/O. NADIPI KONDAYYA , AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ALL ARE R/O. MALINENIPATNAM VILLAGE, ATLOOR 3 MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI G SRINIVASULU IAS, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GALERU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTI PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI A VENKATESU, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION,UNIT-LL,TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEW COLLECTORATE,KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 11.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.915 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Lordships, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit to implead the proposed Respondent as Respondent No.3 in Contempt Case C.C.No.457 of 2025, and also pending miscellaneous petitions therein on the file of this Hon'ble High Court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. J DILEEP KUMAR 4 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 11.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.915 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents on counter submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in the contempt has been complied with however with certain delay and the same is neither willful nor wanton and tendered unconditional apology and prayed to close the contempt. 3. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that pursuant to filing of the Contempt, the respondent authorities had passed orders, as such, the orders of this Court dated 11.01.2024 have been complied with and prayed to close the contempt. 4. Recording the said submissions, as the authorities have complied with the orders dated 11.01.2024, there remains nothing for adjudication and this Court, having satisfied with the reasons for the delay, is inclined to close the contempt. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 31st July, 2025 RKS