Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77272 (KAR)

SUNIL KUMAR G v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.A/1628/2025 · 2025-11-05

G Basavaraja

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44596 CRL.A No. 1628 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1628 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SUNIL KUMAR G, S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT SATYADEVA PG, 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, MURUGESHPALYA, HAL, BENGALURU-560008. PERMANENT R/AT: NO.126, BATNAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR - 563129. …APPELLANT (BY SRI VINAYA B R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY UPPARPET P.S. REP BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. SHRUTHI.B, W/O LATE RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.303/D, KEB QUARTERS, BANGALURU-560010 …RESPONDENTS (BY MS. ASMA KOUSER, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 SRI MANJUNATHA A S, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44596 CRL.A No. 1628 of 2025 THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14(A)2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE FTSC-V ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN SPL.CASE NO.996/2025 (CR.NO.77/2025) AND GRANT THE REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.CASE NO.996/2025 (CR.NO.77/2025) FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 6,4(2) OF POCSO ACT 2012 AND ALSO UNDER SEC.3(2)(v),3(1)(w)(i)(ii) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT AMENDMENT ACT AND ALSO U/S 65(1),137(2) OB BNS ACT WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE FTSC-V ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL JUDGMENT The appellant's counsel has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal, in which it is stated as under: "The petitioner above named respectfully prays this Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka that in the petition some typographical error which are submitted by the petitioner at the time of filing of the petition, now the petitioner is withdrawing the petition and filing fresh petition in the above case, in the interest of justice and equity." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44596 CRL.A No. 1628 of 2025 In view of the submission, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh appeal as per law. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE AP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42