Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77272 (BOM)

ARIF AJIJ KURESHI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

BA/4982/2024 · 2025-11-28

Shri R N Laddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Mamta Kale 22-ba-4982-2024.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Bail Application No. 4982 of 2024 Arif Ajij Kureshi … Applicant versus The State of Maharasha and Anr. …Respondents ---- None present for the Applicant. Mr S S Pednekar, APP, for Respondent / State. ---- Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 28 November 2025 P.C.: . It is evident from the record that the present application was initially listed on 12th September 2025, on which date, upon a request made by the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, the matter was adjourned and directed to be placed on 8th October 2025. However, on 8th October 2025, none appeared on behalf of the applicant, and consequently, the matter was further adjourned to 10th November 2025. 2. On 10th November 2025 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the applicant, and the matter was once again adjourned and posted for hearing today. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted, there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant even today, nor has any application been moved seeking adjournment or explaining the __________________________________________________ 28 November 2025 MAMTA AMAR KALE Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date: 2025.11.28 19:24:18 +0530 Mamta Kale 22-ba-4982-2024.docx absence. 3. In view of the repeated non-apperance of the applicant and the absence of any steps taken to prosecute the matter, this Court is left with no option but to infer that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the present application. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (R.N. Laddha, J.) __________________________________________________ 28 November 2025