SARLA YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/19067/2025 · 2025-07-11
Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77260 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77260 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-19067-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CWP-19067-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.07.2025
Sarla Yadav and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, D.A.G., Haryana with Mr. Karan Jindal, Advocate, Asst. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and Ms. Sharvi Dadwal, Advocate for the respondent-HSVP. **** SUDHIR SINGH
, J. (oral)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioner @ 15% p.a. or more, on the entire amount deposited by the petitioners towards the cost of the plot as the physical possession of the same has not been delivered to the petitioners till date.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already made representations dated 18.06.2025 and 19.06.2025 SATYAWAN 2025.07.15 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-19067-2025 (O&M) 2 (Annexures P-2 and P-3) to respondents No. 2 to 3 i.e. Chief Administrator, Administrator and Estate Officer-II, Haryana Shaheri Vikas Pradhikaran, for redressal of their grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with their concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation(s).
3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4 -HSVP and submits that the said representation/application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Administrator, Haryana Shaheri Vikas Pradhikaran to look into the pending representation dated 19.06.2025 (Annexures P-3) and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE 11.07.2025 (ALOK JAIN) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
SATYAWAN 2025.07.15 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document