Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43621 RSA No. 1109 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1109 OF 2009 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. RAJE GOWDA SON OF LATE KULLE GOWDA AGED 36 YEARS
2.
SMT. SUJATHA WIFE OF RAJE GOWDA AGED 22 YEARS
BOTH RESIDING AT DODDASOMANAHALLI VILLAGE SANTHEBACHAHALLI HOBLI K R PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 436 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI: BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. SAVITHRAMMA WIFE OF RAME GOWDA MAJOR BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI. RAME GOWDA SON OF KAPANI GOWDA AGED 70 YEARS DODDASOMANAHALLI VILLAGE SANTHEBACHAHALLI HOBLI K R PET TALUK - 571 436 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI: C M KEMPEGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43621 RSA No. 1109 of 2009
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.04.2009, PASSED IN R.A.NO.16/2008, ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), AND JMFC, K.R.PET, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2008, PASSED IN OS.NO.179/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, (JR. DN.), & JMFC, K.R.PET.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants sought for pass over in the morning session. When the matter is again called in the afternoon session, he prays for time.
2. The order sheet dated 10.10.2025 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the appellants are absent. No representation.
Learned counsel for the respondent is present. The appeal is of the year 2009. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity, list this matter on 16.10.2025."
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43621 RSA No. 1109 of 2009
3. Inspite of that, the tactics of seeking pass over the matter is being played only to avoid addressing the arguments on merits. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
*bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3