Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77254 (MAD)

N.MANOJ NARAYANAN v. THE ZONAL HEALTH OFFICER

WP/26999/2025 · 2025-07-25

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:MHC:1879 WP No. 26999 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 26999 of 2025 N.Manoj Narayanan Petitioner(s) Vs The Zonal Health Officer Zone- VIII, Greater Chennai Corporation, 36-B, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai- 600 030. Respondent(s) PRAYER To call for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Ma.A.8.Po.Su.Thu.Na.Ka.No.1893/2025 dated 01.07.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondent to enter the name of the father of the petitioner's deceased father Mr.K.K.Narayanan as Sankaran Nair in the Births and Deaths Register maintained by him in accordance with Section 15 of Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 and issue appropriate certificate in accordance with the said alternation to the petitioner. Page No.1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26999 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Mohanraj For Respondent(s): Mrs.Aswini Devi, SC ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the respondent dated 01.07.2025 and for a consequential direction to the respondent to mention the name of the deceased Mr.K.K.Narayanan's father as Mr.Sankaran Nair instead of Mr.Veerasamy. 2. Heard Mr.P.Mohanraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.Aswini Devi, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 3. The respondent has issued the impugned proceedings dated 01.07.2025, rejecting the claim made by the petitioner on the ground that no such correction is permissible under the provisions of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. Page No.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26999 of 2025 4. In the considered view of this Court, Section 15 of the Act read with Rule 11 of the Tamil Nadu Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 2000 clearly gives the power to the respondents to make necessary correction, since any improper entry made in the death certificate can also be corrected apart from correcting any clerical mistakes. 5. This Court also finds that there are documents to establish the correct name of the father of the deceased Mr.K.K.Narayanan and which is Mr.Sankaran Nair. Hence, the impugned rejection order passed by the respondent dated 01.05.2025, is quashed and there shall be a direction to the respondent to entertain the application of the writ petitioner, conduct an inquiry and incorporate the correction in the death certificate. This process shall be completed by the respondent within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page No.3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26999 of 2025 6. In result, this Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms. No costs. 25-07-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Jeni To The Zonal Health Officer Zone- VIII, Greater Chennai Corporation, 36-b, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai- 600 030. Page No.4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26999 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. Jeni WP No. 26999 of 2025 25-07-2025 Page No.5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis