Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28682 RPFC No. 50 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 50 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. SYED AKRAM S/O SYED AKBAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT SHIKARIPALYA, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560 100. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DUSHYANTH ARADHYA H.C., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SMT. JABEEN TAJ W/O SYED AKRAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT C/O SHEIK MOINDIN, NEAR ALEEB BAKERY, MANGAMMANA PALYA, BENGALURU-560 026. …RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN CLR.MISC.NO.428/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28682 RPFC No. 50 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
The RPFC is of the year 2024. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondent.
2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondent, the matter was
directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today.
3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 83