Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7724 (UTT)

SHYAM SINGH DHANAK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1090/2024 · 2025-06-26

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5536 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 26.06.2025 BA1 No. 1090 of 2024 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Harshit Sanwal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the present bail application has become infructuous, as the applicant has already been granted bail by the learned trial court vide order dated 02.06.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has also placed on record a certified copy of the order dated 02.06.2025. The Registry is directed to paginate the same as per record. 5. In view of the above, the first bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 26.06.2025 Mamta 2025:UHC:5536