HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 24300 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ekansh Varma, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has raised preliminary objection and submitted that petitioner is having alternative remedy to file appeal before District Judge under section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which could not be disputed by learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Under such facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before the District Judge, if so advised. October 8, 2025 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Lal Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ekansh Varma, Manu Vardhana (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Dharmendra Kumar Rai .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad