Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77227 (KAR)

SRI SUDHAKAR K M v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9385/2021 · 2025-07-30

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29393 CRL.P No. 9385 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9385 OF 2021 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI SUDHAKAR K M SON OF SRI D MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT NO 421/1, NEGILU NILAYA, MAHADESHWARANAGARA, KANAKANAGARA, 6TH CROSS, CHANNAPATNA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU M S, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH RURAL POLICE STATION, CHANNAPATNA, REP BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU. 2. RAKSHITHA M A W/O SRI K N SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT MAHADESWARANAGARA, SATHANUR ROAD, 6TH CROSS, CHANNAPATNA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29393 CRL.P No. 9385 of 2021 AND ALSO RESIDING AT D/O ANKEGOWDA, KODAMBAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, VIRUPASKIPURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160 ALSO RESIDING AT RAKSHITHA M A, W/O SRI K M SUDHAKAR, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT, THE FIR FILED UNDER SEC.420,468,471 OF IPC ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IN CR.NO.174/2021 BY THE CHANNAPATNA RURAL P.S., AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNAPATNA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2021. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29393 CRL.P No. 9385 of 2021 4. Vide order dated 21.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2