Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77226 (PNJ)

MAINPAL YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/19167/2025 · 2025-07-25

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-19167-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-19167-2025 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 Mainpal Yadav and another …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-authorities to fix the pay/pension of the petitioners at par with their junior. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide the pending legal notice, dated 26.05.2025, Annexure P-6, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice and submits that the pending legal notice, dated 26.05.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director General, Secondary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PAYAL 2025.07.25 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-19167-2025 -2- 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 25.07.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.07.25 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document