IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 CWP-19653-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.09.2025 Sunder ...Petitioner Versus Chairman Appellate Tribunal-cum-Senior Citizen Maintenance Tribunal, Charkhi Dadri and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Aneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI , J.(oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset informs this Court that on account of supervening events i.e. the petitioner has since died, the prayer made in the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 16.09.2025 (KULDEEP TIWARI) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SATYAWAN 2025.09.17 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document