Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77216 (PAT)

Nathun Mistri v. The State of Bihar

/69977/2025 · 2025-10-09

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69977 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Nathun Mistri S/o Late Sunder Mistri R/o Village- Ora Tola Munshi Bigha, P.S.- Aurangabad (M), District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Pramod Kumar Gupta S/o Muni Lal Gupta R/o Mohalla- Gandhi Nagar, Near Town Inter College, Ward No. 21, P.S.- Aurangabad (T), District- Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Comp. Case No. 179/2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is accused of cheating the complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the transaction is of the year 2005 and the complaint case was filed in the year 2018 after much delay. Learned counsel further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69977 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 31.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co- operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad/concerned Court below in connection with Comp. Case No. 179 of 2018. 8. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands allowed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T