SRI VEERANAGOUDA S/O TIRTHAGOUDA THIRTHAGOUDAR v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/DISCIPLINARY AUTHRORITY
WP/106138/2024 · 2025-02-19
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7721 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7721 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3364 WP No. 106138 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 106138 OF 2024 (S-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. VEERANAGOUDA S/O. TIRTHAGOUDA THIRTHAGOUDAR AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR, NWKRTC, DHARWAD DEPOT, DHARWAD RURAL DIVISION, DIST. DHARWAD- 580001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAVI HEGDE, AND SRI VINAY KUMAR BHAT, ADVOCATES)
AND:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/ DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, NWKRTC, DHARWAD RURAL DIVISION, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD- 580001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASHANT HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 10.10.2024 IN NO.VA.KA.RA.SA/DHA.GRA.VI/SHISTU/942 (2024) 2986, VIDE ANNEXURE-D, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT, AND B) CONSEQUENT UPON QUASHING THE AFORESAID ORDER, AS A SEQUEL DIRECT THE RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3364 WP No. 106138 of 2024
TO PUT BACK THE PETITIONER IN THE SAME POST AND PLACE EARLIER TO IMPUGNED ORDER, AND C) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING THE COST, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
The petitioner calls in question the act of the employer placing him under suspension and a direction to reinstate him back into the same place.
2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Ravi Hegde and Sri.Vinay Kumar Bhat appearing for the petitioner and the
learned counsel Sri.Prashant Hosamani appearing for the respondent-Corporation.
3. The challenge in the case at hand is to the
order of suspension on 10.10.2024. During subsistence of the petition, it transpires that the Corporation has revoked the order of suspension on 27.11.2024 and the petitioner
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3364 WP No. 106138 of 2024
has joined back to the place which he was directed to report.
4. Therefore, the petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
KGK / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39.2