Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7721 (JHR)

JAVED KHAN ALIAS MD JAVED v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2221/2025 · 2025-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:16583] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2221 of 2025 ------ Javed Khan @ Md. Javed, aged about 33 years, son of Md. Salim Khan, resident of Village Nayee Sarai, P.O. and P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh (Jharkahnd) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-23-06-2025 I.A. No.5792 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing. Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2221 of 2025 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.349 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 22B of NDPS Act and Section 27 (b)(ii)/18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was bringing intoxicating injection from Ranchi to Ramgarh in a bus which was carried by co-accused Firoj Khan @ Laddan Khan and the petitioner was accompanying and on seeing the police party, co-accused threw the carton and fled away. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that charge- sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.12.2024 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. Drawing attention of this court to para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.349 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/