Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77202 (KAR)

SRI M SRINIVASAN v. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/18171/2024 · 2025-10-09

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39832 WP No. 18171 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.18171 OF 2024 (BDA) BETWEEN: SRI M. SRINIVASAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O SRI MUTHUSWAMY, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.760, ‘B’ TYPE, IV PHASE, DOMLUR II STAGE, BENGALURU-560071. …PETITIONER (BY SRI C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, GUTTAHALLI, BENGALURU-560020. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. DEPUTY SECRETARY-1 THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 5TH MAIN ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, GUTTAHALLI, BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXECUTE THE REGISTERED SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER DATED 28.10.2022 MADE IN W.P.NO.8301/2021 (BDA) ON THE FILE OF THE HONOURABLE SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-S TO THE WRIT PETITION IN RESPECT OF BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FLAT NO.760, ‘B’ TYPE, PHASE IV, 2ND STAGE, DOMLUR, BENGALURU-560071 BY COLLECTING DUES, IF ANY AND ETC. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39832 WP No. 18171 of 2024 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo, which reads as under: “The undersigned counsel appearing for the Petitioner above named hereby prays that this Hon’ble Court may be please to dismiss the above matter as withdraw. Since, the cause of the action does not survive for consideration. Hence, prays to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn in the interest of justice.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of memo, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56