Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77201 (PNJ)

RAMBIR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/20193/2024 · 2025-04-02

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-20193-2024 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 106 CWP-20193-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2025. RAMBIR SINGH ... Petitioner(s) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Anita Balyan, Senior Panel Counsel, for the respondents/UOI. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) CM-4473-CWP-2025 In view of the reasons mentioned in the present application seeking preponement of the date of hearing in the main RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.02 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20193-2024 -2- case which is stated to be fixed for hearing on 21.04.2025, the same is allowed. The main case is taken on board today itself. Main case The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for seeking quashing of the action/letter dated 22.07.2022 and 06.12.2023 (Annexures P-3 and P-5) whereby the petitioner was directed to submit documents regarding quashing of the FIR and the certificate. 2 Learned counsel for the respondents contends that the prayer of the petitioner has already been accepted by the respondents vide letter dated 11.11.2024 and formal promotion orders have also been issued. 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. 4 The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. April 02, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.04.02 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document