Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 772 (UTT)

MOHD. MUKEEM ROSHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/10/2022 · 2025-08-25

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:7575 WPCRL No.10 of 2022 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Lochan Sah, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that final report has been submitted in the present matter, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 25.08.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.08.27 17:54:48 +05'30'