M/S AKHILA BHARATH SRI VASAVI PENUGONDA TRUST v. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
WP/20550/2022 · 2025-08-28
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77198 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77198 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39458 WP No. 20550 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 20550 OF 2022 (T-IT) BETWEEN:
M/S. AKHILA BHARATH SRI VASAVI PENUGONDA TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS TREASURER N.S.SRINIVASA MURTHY S/O N.K.SUBBAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS NO.23A, VASAVI NILAYA SERPENTINE ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU – 560 020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES THROUGH THE CHAIRPERSON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI – 110 002.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(4) BENGALURU 3RD FLOOR, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2 (4) BENGALURU – 560 001.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39458 WP No. 20550 of 2022
3.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL INCOME TAX (INV.) CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.V. RAVI RAJ AND SRI M.DILIP, ADVOCATES)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148A(b) OF THE ACT DTD.18.5.2022 OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 BY THE R-2 BEARING DIN AND LETTER NO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043059318(1) HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A1; QUASH THE ORDER DTD.29.7.2022 PASSED UNDER SECTION 148A(d) OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 BY THE R-2 BEARING DIN AND ORDER NO.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044288340(1) HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A2; QUASH THE NOTICE DTD.29.7.2022 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 BY THE R-2 BEARING DIN AND DOCUMENT NO.ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1044310231(1) HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A3; QUASH THE IMPUGNED INSTRUCTION BEARING NO.1/2022 DTD.11.5.2022 ISSUED BY THE R-2 ANNEXURE-B TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SAME PURPORTS TO CLARIFY THAT THE PROCEEDINGS PURSUED UNDER SECTION 148A AND THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 148 AFTER THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT’S ORDER DTD.4.5.2022 THE NOTICE CAN BE ISSUED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 AND QUASHING THE
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39458 WP No. 20550 of 2022
CONSEQUENT DIRECTION THEREIN TO ISSUE FRESH NOTICES UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT FOR AY 2014-15 WITHOUT HAVING REGARD TO THE JURISDICTIONAL CONDITIONS SET OUT IN THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 149(1)(b) OF THE ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER The petitioner - Assessee is before this Court seeking quashment of notices bearing No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022- 23/1043059318(1) dated 18.05.2022, ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022-23/1044310231(1) dated 29.07.2022, instruction bearing No.1/2022 dated 11.05.2022 and order No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044288340(1) dated 29.07.2022 passed by the respondents – Revenue under Sections 148, 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act,
1961.
2. Heard Sri Annamalai S., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Y.V.Raviraj and Sri M. Dilip, learned counsel for the respondents.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39458 WP No. 20550 of 2022
3. The grounds projected in the subject petition in support of the prayer quoted supra are identical to the ones considered by this Court in W.P.No.28182/2024 and connected matters, disposed on 28.08.2025.
4. In the light of the issue being similar and the reasons rendered therein becomes applicable to the case at hand, the petition deserves to be disposed on the same lines. Therefore, I pass the following:
ORDER (i) The impugned notices bearing No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1043059318(1) dated 18.05.2022, ITBA/AST/M/148_1/2022- 23/1044310231(1) dated 29.07.2022, instruction bearing No.1/2022 dated 11.05.2022 issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of Section 151A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in this petition would stand quashed. (ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive the petition in the event, the Apex Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the matter pending before it.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39458 WP No. 20550 of 2022
(iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petition is allowed. (iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of this petition would become necessary.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 308