Cont.P.No.2618 of 2025 ------------------------------ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.09.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Cont.P.No.2618 of 2025 S.Mohanaraman ...Petitioner Vs. T.Sivakumar, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Balasaartuleeswarar Temple, Office at Arulmighu Padavettamman Temple, Pudupet, Gudiyatham – 632 602. ...Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent for disobeying the order passed by this Court on 13.06.2024 in the Writ Petition in W.P.No.26919 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Deeraj, For M/s.P.V.Law Associates For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthikeyan Govt. Advocate (HR&CE) ***** O R D E R 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2618 of 2025 ------------------------------ (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The present Contempt Petition has been instituted to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 13.06.2024 made in W.P.No.26919 of 2022. 2. This Court issued multiple directions in the writ proceeding. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that during the marriage ceremony in the temple, the directions issued by the Court are flouted. 3. Per contra the learned Government Advocate based on the written instructions of the Executive Officer of the Temple would submit that the directions / instructions are affixed in the temple notice board as well as the flex boards are being maintained by the temple. In the event of any violation by any of the devotees or any person, suitable actions will be initiated. 4. It is made clear that the Executive Officer is expected to be vigilant while conducting ceremonies and festivals in the temple and ensure that the directions issued by the Courts are followed scrupulously. Since the petitioner had not enclosed any proof to establish that there is wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court, no 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2618 of 2025 ------------------------------ further consideration is necessary. Consequently, this contempt petition stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 18.09.2025 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2618 of 2025 ------------------------------ S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. dsa Cont.P.No.2618 of 2025 18.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis