- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30503 WP No. 25065 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 25065 OF 2017 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN: 1. SYED MUSTAFA @ HABEEB PASHA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED MURTUZA HEREDITARY MUTHAVALLI, BARA-IMAM MAKAN DODDAPET MAIN ROAD, GORIPET, KOLAR-563 101 2. MOHAMMED ISHAQ S/O. CHANDSAB MULLA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS VICE CHAIRMAN, ROSHAN MASJID AND ROSHAN SHADI MAHAL, RESIDENT OF GODIHAL COLONY, J.M.ROAD, VIJAYAPUR-586 104 3. ABDUL RAZACK DUDHANI S/O ABDUL GANI, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS PRESIDENT OF ANJUMAN-E-ISLAM, SINDGI AND MUTHAVALLI OF IDGAH AND KHABRASTAN SINDGI, RESIDENT OF TAKIA GALI SINDGI-586 128 VIJAYAPUR DIST. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MINORITY AFFAIRS 11TH FLOOR, PANDIT DEENDAYAL ANTYODAYA BHAVAN, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30503 WP No. 25065 of 2017 C.G.O.COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY 2. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3. MOHAMMED MOHSIN, I.A.S., ADMINISTRATOR, KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S.VENKATANARAYANA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SMT. SABAHATH SULTANA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT, SECTION 69 OF THE WAQF ACT, 1995 IS ULTRA-VIRES OF SECTION 32 (2) (d) OF THE WAQF ACT, 1995 AND CONSEQUENTLY, QUASH/STRIKE OF SECTION 69 OF THE WAQF ACT, 1995 [CENTRAL ACT NO.43/1995] FROM THE STATUE BOOK AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30503 WP No. 25065 of 2017 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31