HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2604/2025 Manish Gautam, Son of Shri Chandrabhan Gautam, aged about 26 Years, Resident of VPO Encher, Tehsil Nadbai, Distt. Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department of Medical And Health, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director (Non Gazetted) Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Alwar, Distt. Alwar. 4. Block Chief Medical Officer, Kherli, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Nursing Officer on Urgent Temporary Basis under Rule 27 of Rajasthan Medical and Health Service Rules, 1965 for a particular term subject to availability of regularly selected candidates. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the services of the petitioner has been terminated by the respondents after receipt of the regularly selected candidates in the department. Counsel submits that some post of Nursing Officers (2 of 3) [CW-2604/2025] are still lying vacant, therefore a direction may be issued to the respondents to continue the services of the petitioner as Nursing Officer on the said post against the vacant post in District Alwar or any other district where the posts are lying vacant. Learned counsel submits that under the similar circumstances, the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Anil Prajapat and Others Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Others while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20441/2024 has granted liberty to the co-petitioners to file a representation before the authorities and the authorities have been directed to consider the same and decide the same within a stipulated time. So, similar order may be passed in the instant case also. 3. As per the contentions made by counsel for the petitioner that even after selection of the regularly selected candidates still some post are lying vacant with the respondents and the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Anil Prajapat (supra) has granted liberty to the co-petitioners to file representation before the respondents-authorities and the respondents- authorities have been further directed to consider their representations in accordance with law in a particular time, thus, under these similar circumstances, the same prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation with regard to redressal of his grievance before the respondents-authorities. 5. In case, representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week from today, it is expected from the (3 of 3) [CW-2604/2025] respondents to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks thereafter. 6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/39