Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7719 (PNJ)

ISHWAR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/20341/2025 · 2026-07-14

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 110 CWP-20341-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-14.07.2026 Ishwar Singh and others … Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** VIKAS BAHL , J.(Oral) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to release the land of the petitioners on which they have constructed houses and are still in possession and living there and have not been paid the compensation which was acquired vide notification dated 22.05.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Annexure P-1) and the notification dated 10.05.1996 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Annexure P-2), as the petitioners are still in possession of the land in question. 2. On 10.09.2025, the Coordinate Division Bench of this Court has passed the following order:- GEETA RANI 2026.07.15 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh CWP-20341-2025 (O&M) ( 2 ) “Present: Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. ***** Before proceeding further with the matter we direct the learned counsel for the petitioners to produce the final orders passed by this Court in CWP-7205-1998, CWP-15144- 2008, CWP-8081-2016 and CWP-8643-2016. Adjourned to 13.01.2026. 10.09.2025” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition after giving full and better particulars and also after complying with the order dated 10.09.2025. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 14.07.2026 Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2026.07.15 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh