Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77177 (ALL)

M/S SATYAM CONSTRUCTION v. VIKASH KUMAR JAUHARI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRANTIYA DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAHOBA

CAPL/3502/2025 · 2025-09-14

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3502 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned standing counsel for opposite party. 2. Pursuant to the previous orders of this Court, learned standing counsel for opposite party has produced instruction dated 12.09.2025, which is taken on record. Based upon instruction, he submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with as Rs. 7,17,495/- & Rs. 9,21,082/- have been credited in the account of applicant, therefore, this application may be dismissed as infructuous 3. Under such facts of the case no further order is required to be passed. 4. File is consigned to the record. 5. However, in case amount is not received by the applicant in his account, liberty is given to move recall application. September 15, 2025 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitenrda Kumar Ojha, Om Prakash Chaube Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) M/S Satyam Construction .....Applicant(s) Vikash Kumar Jauhari, Executive Engineer, Prantiya Division Public Works Department Mahoba .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad