Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77173 (KAR)

SMT. LEELAVATHI v. SRI. H S SRIDHARA

RFA/337/2019 · 2025-11-19

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47600-DB R.F.A No.337/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.337/2019 (SP) BETWEEN: SMT. LEELAVATHI W/O SRI. MOHAN P. NAYAK AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS VIJAYANAGAR, B K ROAD SAGAR TOWN-577 401 SHIMOGA DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KESHAVA BHAT A, ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. H.S. SRIDHARA S/O SRI. HUCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 2. SMT. TARA DEVI W/O SRI. H.S. SRIDHARA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. BOTH ARE AGRICULTURISTS R/O JAMBAGARU VILLAGE, BELALAMAKKI GANDHINAGAR, SAGAR TOWN & POST SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR R.S. ADV., FOR R1 SRI. R. GOPAL, ADV., FOR R2) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47600-DB R.F.A No.337/2019 THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULES 1 TO 5 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SAGAR DATED 21.12.2018 IN O.S.NO.6/2013 AND DECREE THE SUIT AS PRAYED FOR IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo reads as under: "The subject matter of the Appeal is amicably settled out of court. Therefore, the appellant is not intended to prosecute the above Appeal. It is prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may be please to permit the appellant to withdraw the above Appeal as not pressed. The office may be directed to refund the Court Fee paid by the appellant. The Appellant here by enclosed self attested copy of her Aadhar card. Prays accordingly." 2. The memo is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47600-DB R.F.A No.337/2019 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The Registry shall refund the eligible Court fees on proper identification. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44