Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77167 (PNJ)

VIJAY KUMAR VERMA v. JASWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

COCP/2538/2023 · 2025-08-20

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (216) COCP-2538-2023 (O&M) Decided on : 20.08.2025 Vijay Kumar Verma ……Petitioner Versus Jaswinder Singh & others ……Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr.Sudesh Sahi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Karunesh Kaushal, A.A.G., Punjab. Mr.Naveen Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 8. Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.10 & 11. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for disobedience and violation of judgment and decree dated 04.07.2022 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana. 2. A perusal of judgment and decree dated 04.07.2022 shows that suit filed by petitioner-plaintiff is decreed in his favour. However, no direction is given. In fact, the petitioner is seeking execution of judgment and decree dated 04.07.2022 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana by filing the present contempt petition. Contempt jurisdiction cannot be invoked as a substitute for execution of decree. 3. Since the Court was inclined to impose costs for filing such a misconceived petition, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the present contempt petition. 4. In view of the above, Civil Original Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. August 20, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) sailesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SAILESH RANJAN 2025.08.30 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document