WP (C) No. 1371/2025 Page 1 of 2 S. No. 135 Suppl. List. 5 IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP (C) No. 1371/2025 CM No. 3616/2025 Muskan Bashir & Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Saleem Vs. Union Territory of JK &Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms Rahella Khan, AC CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE O R D E R 06.06.2025 1. The petitioners seek a direction to official respondents to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from private respondents Nos. 5 to 9. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and out of their free will they got married. Copy of Nikahnama has been placed on record. They submit that since they have contracted the marriage against the wishes of private respondents Nos. 5 to 9, as such, they are facing harassment from his side. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and Anr., 2006(5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect the life and liberty, if approached. 4. In this view of the matter, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that the official respondents shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in their married life, if they approach them. It is made clear that WP (C) No. 1371/2025 Page 2 of 2 no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 06.06.2025 Syed Nuzhat