MOHAMMAD RASHID ALI KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/280/2025 · 2025-08-11
Subhash Chandra Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7715 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7715 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:137160 Court No. - 84 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 280 of 2025 Revisionist :- Mohammad Rashid Ali Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shahnawaz Akhtar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amir Khan,G.A. and Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 540 of 2025 Revisionist :- Smt. Halima Alias Sweety Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Amir Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shahnawaz Akhtar Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J. Heard Sri Shahnawaz Akhtar learned counsel for the revisionist/opposite party, Sri Amir Khan learned counsel for the opposite party/revisionist and perused the record. The Criminal Revision No. 280 of 2025 has been filed by the husband/revisionist with a prayer to allow the revision and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 30.11.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Budaun in Criminal Misc. Case No. 435 of 2021 (Smt. Halima @ Sweety Vs. Mohammad Rashid Ali Khan), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Budaun fixing amount of maintenance Rs 15,000/- per month in favour of wife. Criminal Revision No. 540 of 2025 has been filed by the wife/revisionist with a prayer to modify the impugned order dated 30.11.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Budaun in Criminal Misc. Case No. 435 of 2021 (Smt. Halima @ Sweety Vs. Mohammad Rashid Ali Khan), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Budaun and to enhance the amount of maintenance Rs. 25,000/- on the place of Rs. 18,000/- per month. Since both the criminal revisions arose from the same judgment and order, therefore, they are being heard and decided together by
common order. It is submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties before the learned trial court in the proceedings under Section 147 B.N.S.S. as Case No. 71 of 2025. Compromise was filed on 30.05.2025 and was verified by the learned trial court on the same day. Certified copy of compromise has been filed through supplementary affidavit that is on record. As per compromise the matter was settled for lumpsum amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- in all cases, therefore, request to decide both the cases in terms of compromise.
Since the matter has already been settled between the parties amicably as aforesaid and compromise has been verified by the learned trial court, therefore, it will be of no use to proceed further in the aforesaid cases but both these revisions are being decided in terms of compromise as entered into between the parties on
30.05.2025. Accordingly, these revisions are disposed of in terms of compromise. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Suraj Srivastav Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad