Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
117
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-19155-2025 Date of Decision: 17.07.2025
Tarsem Babu
....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Yogesh Vashista, Advocate for
Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Ms. Simran Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to grant compensation of Rs.4 Crore as he has met with an accident while on duty.
2.
The petitioner claims that his upper limbs and one lower limb had been amputated on 29.05.2023 due to electric shock. He, at the time of accident, was on duty, thus, he is entitled to compensation payable under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as ‘1923 Act’).
3.
On being confronted with provisions of 1923 Act, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw with liberty to approach PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.17 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-19155-2025
-2-
Commissioner under 1923 Act.
4.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 17.07.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.17 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document