IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 103 CWP-783-2017 (O & M) Sarwan Singh and others vs. CWP-12027 Vishal Kumar and others vs. CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. 3 are concerned, the present petition has been rendered infr may be disposed of as such, thereof, appointments have been given to them. 2. 3. instructions from Sh. Amanpreet Singh, official of the Selection Board, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2017 (O & M) Sarwan Singh and others vs. State of Punjab 12027-2025 Vishal Kumar and others vs. State of Punjab CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP-783 None for the petitioners in CWP Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Gauravjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate for respondents No.51,52,54,56,57 to 64,66,68 to 73, 75 to 83, 85 to 100, 102 to 109, 111, 112, 114, 115 to 124. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for respondents No.49, 55, 67, 101, 110 and 113. Mr. Gurpreet Jayia, Advocate, for respondents No.74 and 84. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that insofar as petitioners No.2 and 3 are concerned, the present petition has been rendered infr may be disposed of as such, on account of the fact th thereof, appointments have been given to them. Ordered accordingly. Learned State counsel with regard to petitioner No.1, on instructions from Sh. Amanpreet Singh, official of the Selection Board, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 24.07.2025 f Punjab and Others f Punjab and Others BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, 783-2017. None for the petitioners in CWP-12027-2025. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Gauravjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate for 51,52,54,56,57 to 64,66,68 to 73, 75 to 83, 85 to 100, 102 to 109, 111, 112, 114, 115 to 124. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for 101, 110 and 113. Mr. Gurpreet Jayia, Advocate, for respondents No.74 and 84. Learned counsel submits that insofar as petitioners No.2 and 3 are concerned, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and on account of the fact that during pendency thereof, appointments have been given to them. e counsel with regard to petitioner No.1, on instructions from Sh. Amanpreet Singh, official of the Selection Board, PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.25 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-783-2017 and -2- CWP-12027-2025 states that certain documents were required of him, which having not been furnished, no further action could be taken. 4. The present petition qua petitioner No.1 is disposed of reserving liberty with him to submit a representation to the respondent- department alongwith the required documents, in case his claim still subsists. 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. 24.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.25 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.