114. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Palvi and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. respondents No apprehend threat to their life at t who are stated to be family members of 2. No.1, aged about married on 08.07 then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated (Annexure P of Police, District alleged threat perception. Learned counsel submits that despite the official respondents having been communicated about the alleged threat perception, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision: and another Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Rohiteshar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents No.4 who are stated to be family members of petitioner No. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, aged about 23 years, and petitioner No.2, aged about 2 08.07.2025 against the wishes of private respondents. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated (Annexure P-5) was also made to respondent No.2 of Police, District Gurdaspur, wherein a mention has been made about the alleged threat perception. Learned counsel submits that despite the official respondents having been communicated about the alleged threat perception, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT NDIGARH CRWP-7380-2025 Date of decision: 11.07.2025 .... Petitioners .... Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL vocate for the petitioners. Prayer in the instant petition is for issuance of directions to .2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who he hands of private respondents No.4 and 5, petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner years, and petitioner No.2, aged about 26 years, got against the wishes of private respondents. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 08.07.2025 5) was also made to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent , wherein a mention has been made about the alleged threat perception. Learned counsel submits that despite the official respondents having been communicated about the alleged threat perception, Prayer in the instant petition is for issuance of directions to .2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, who , Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner years, got against the wishes of private respondents. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the .2025 uperintendent , wherein a mention has been made about the alleged threat perception. Learned counsel submits that despite the official respondents having been communicated about the alleged threat perception, SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.07.11 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7380-2025 - 2 - no steps have been taken to come to the rescue of the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Gurdaspur to look into the representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On asking of the Court, Mr. H.S.Deol, Senior DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Gurdaspur to look into the representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE July 11, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.07.11 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document