FAO-5458 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 219 Jeeto and others Sukhwant Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) the Award dated 02.01.2014 passed Claims Tribunal petition filed by the appellants was dismissed. pertains to the year appeal as the matter 24.01.2017 at the written/oral request or on account of non behalf of the appellant. Vide order dated 15.11.2017, notice in the application (CM Act, for condonation of delay of 433 days in filing the appeal was issued by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter on 05.09.2019 when this case was listed for hearing, learned coun time to file an application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent No. 2 as also to supply particulars of respondent No. 3 there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 19.01.2023, learned counsel for the appellant had sought 5458-2015 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO Date of Decision: Jeeto and others Versus Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present appeal has been filed by the claimant the Award dated 02.01.2014 passed by the learned Motor Accident Tribunal (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Amritsar, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants was dismissed. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) shows that pertains to the year 2015. Notice has not yet been issued in the main appeal as the matter was adjourned on 21.09.2015, 25.02.2016 and 24.01.2017 at the written/oral request or on account of non behalf of the appellant. Vide order dated 15.11.2017, notice in the ication (CM-17199-CII-2015) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 433 days in filing the appeal was issued ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter on 05.09.2019 when this case was listed for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant time to file an application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent No. 2 as also to supply particulars of respondent No. 3 there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 19.01.2023, learned counsel for the appellant had sought IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5458-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.04.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The present appeal has been filed by the claimants against by the learned Motor Accident (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Amritsar, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants was dismissed. sheet(s) shows that though the matter . Notice has not yet been issued in the main was adjourned on 21.09.2015, 25.02.2016 and 24.01.2017 at the written/oral request or on account of non-appearance on behalf of the appellant. Vide order dated 15.11.2017, notice in the 2015) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 433 days in filing the appeal was issued ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter on 05.09.2019 when this sel for the appellants had sought time to file an application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent No. 2 as also to supply particulars of respondent No. 3. On 22.09.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 19.01.2023, learned counsel for the appellant had sought against by the learned Motor Accident (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Amritsar, whereby the claim he matter . Notice has not yet been issued in the main was adjourned on 21.09.2015, 25.02.2016 and appearance on behalf of the appellant. Vide order dated 15.11.2017, notice in the 2015) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 433 days in filing the appeal was issued ordinate Bench of this Court. Thereafter on 05.09.2019 when this had sought time to file an application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent . On 22.09.2022, hearing i.e. on 19.01.2023, learned counsel for the appellant had sought RISHU KATARIA 2025.04.23 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-5458 more time to file application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent No. 2 as also to furnish the particulars of respondent No. 3 the needful has not been done till date. on behalf of the appellants, despite the case having been called twice. have exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to of justice. O casual and careless approach. It is clear that their counsel this Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. 21.04.2025 rishu 5458-2015 (O&M) -2- more time to file application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent No. 2 as also to furnish the particulars of respondent No. 3 the needful has not been done till date. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, despite the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to of justice. On the other hand, the appellant casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall .04.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable more time to file application for impleading the LRs of deceased respondent No. 2 as also to furnish the particulars of respondent No. 3, but Today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, despite the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellants exhibited an utterly casual attitude in their pursuit of the present It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to them in the interest appellants have adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the appellants nor seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non- Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No more time to file application for impleading the LRs of deceased but Today, there is no representation pursuit of the present It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the in the interest adopted an utterly nor seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, RISHU KATARIA 2025.04.23 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.