LACHMI KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7344/2025 · 2025-07-09
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77115 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77115 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7344-2025 Date of decision: 09.07.2025 Lachmi Kaur and another
....Petitioners
Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Asmita Kumari, Advocate for the petitioners (through V.C.). Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) The present criminal writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus by directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 10 and they claim themselves to be major and seek protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger from respondents No.4 to 10. They have placed on record marriage certificate (Annexure P-3) to substantiate their claim. The petitioners have also submitted a representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab, who is present in Court accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners is Neha 2025.07.11 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-7344-2025 -2-
directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the State during the course of the day. Without commenting on the relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-5) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 09.07.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.07.11 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document