- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27833 WP No. 33083 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 33083 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MUNIRAJU S/O. LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO. 1125/12, 1ST FLOOR, SERVICE ROAD, HAMPINAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 104, REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER, SRI. K. N. SURENDRA, S/O. NAGU. 2. SMT. CHAYA DEVI D/O. LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NO. 1125/12, 1ST FLOOR, SERVICE ROAD, HAMPINAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 104, REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER, SRI. K. N. SURENDRA, S/O. NAGU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MAHESH M., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27833 WP No. 33083 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, OFFICE AT NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER - 2 THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB), NO. 39, 4TH FLOOR, "SHANTI GRUHA", BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VASANTHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO b) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BEARING NO.CI.58.SPQ2024 DATED 15.03.2024 ISSUED AS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27833 WP No. 33083 of 2024 PER SECTION 1(3) OF KIADB ACT 1966 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-B IN RESPECT OF SY NO.33 MEASURING 0-30 GUNTAS OF S.MADAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA-1 HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: MEMO The undersigned counsel for Petitioners herewith submits that, the present petition was filed challenging the preliminary notification, and in view of the final notification dated issued by the Respondents, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the Petitioners are withdrawing the present petition with a liberty to challenge the said final notification. In the circumstances, the Petitioners pray this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the Petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Petition to challenge the final notification in accordance with law. This Memo may be taken on record and render justice." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27833 WP No. 33083 of 2024 In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9