Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(209)
CRM-M-36417-2025 Decided on : 11.08.2025 Gurpreet Singh ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, Punjab. Ms. Balpreet K. Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant. *****
Sumeet Goel (Oral):
1. Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.86 dated 11.06.2025 registered for offences punishable under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda, Punjab; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. 2. On 14.07.2025, the following order was passed:
“Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.86 dated 11.06.2025 registered for offences punishable under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Nathana, District Bathinda, Punjab; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. Inter alia contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated into the FIR in question on account of a matrimonial dispute of his sister with the complainant-side; though the NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.08.11 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-36417-2025
P a g e | 2
petitioner is stated to be armed with a revolver but the said weapon has not been used; the petitioner is willing to hand over his licensed weapon to the Investigating Officer & the petitioner is willing to join investigation and cooperate therein. Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent- State. Adjourned to 11.08.2025. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 21.07.2025 at 11:00 A.M. in concerned Police Station and join investigation. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bond(s) to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when further called by Investigating Officer, the s shall join the investigation. He shall abide by the condition(s) enumerated under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.”
3. Learned State counsel (on instructions from ASI Jaswinder Singh) has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and he is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4.
Keeping in view the factual milieu of the case in hand, especially the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and he is not required for further custodial interrogation, the petition is allowed and the order dated 14.07.2025 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 482(2) of BNSS. 5. This order should not be treated as “blanket” order. It will not be read granting petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence. NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.08.11 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-36417-2025
P a g e | 3
6. Liberty is reserved in favour of State/complainant to move for cancellation/recall of this order in case the petitioner violates any condition stipulated under Section 482(2) of BNSS or upon showing any other sufficient cause. 7. Needless to say that anything observed herein above shall not be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. 8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. (SUMEET GOEL) August 11, 2025
JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.08.11 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh