Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7710 (KAR)

SRI IRANNA K GUDADARI v. SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN

CCC/100317/2024 · 2025-03-26

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5581-DB CCC No. 100317 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100317 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. IRANNA K. GUDADARI AGE. 43 YEARS, NOW WORKING AS GRADE II, CHIEF OFFICER, TMC, RAMADURG TOWN PANCHAYAT, TQ. RAMADURG, DIST. BELAGAVI-591123. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. S.M. KALWAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. 2. SRI. T. MANJUNATH THE UNDER SECRETARY THE GOVT. OF KARNATAKA DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, BENGALURU 560001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. GANGADHAR J.M., AAG FOR SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR A1 & A2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO, ALLOW THE CONTEMPT PETITION AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.104024/2021 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A). THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRAMING OF CHARGES, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5581-DB CCC No. 100317 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Learned counsel Sri. S.M. Kalwad for the complainant files a memo dated 26.3.2025 seeking leave to withdraw the contempt petition. He would submit that since the respondents/accused have complied the direction issued by this Court in toto and the complainant, being satisfied with the said compliance, has filed the above memo for withdrawal of the contempt petition. Memo is placed on record. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE JTR, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 43