HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23726 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The present petition has been filed praying for the following prayer :- (A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to revaluate/recheck the answer booklet of B.A.M.S. final year supplementary examination year 2025 for the subject namely Shodh Paddhathi Avam Chikitsa Sankhyiki (Research Methodology and Medical Statistics), especially Question No. 4 of the petitioner, within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is student of final year of B.A.M.S. and has successfully completed all the questions relating to the subject, namely Research Methodology and Medical Statistics in the supplementary examinations 2025 held by the College. He submitted that the petitioner got 17 marks out of 50 in the said subject. He also submitted that passing marks of the said subject is 25 marks out of 50 marks of the total. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the petitioner has given correct answer of the question no. 4 in the subject of Mathematics and the answer has been verified by the expert in the said subject and found that the answer of the question given by the petitioner is correct. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that since the question no. 4 has been attempted and given right Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gopal Misra, Shiv Mangal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rohit Pandey Mohd. Parvez .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) answer, therefore the petitioner may be awarded full marks out of 10 and if he will get full marks then the total marks obtained in the subject of mathematics will be 27 marks but he has been given only two marks in question no. 4. 3. Per contra, Sri Rohit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent-University vehemently opposed the instant petition and submitted that there are no provision of revaluation of the marks in the statute of the University, therefore the University is not able to revaluate the marks of the students. Sri Pandey further submitted on instructions that the tick which has been vehemently relied by the petitioner in the writ petition is not given by the petitioner but the tick was given by the computer while checking the page. In support of his argument, learned counsel for the respondent-University has referred to paragraph nos. 11 and 12 of the counter affidavit. 4. In the rejoinder affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the University has not denied that the petitioner has attempted the question no. 4 and given correct answer. The crux of the counter affidavit filed by the University is only that there are no provision of revaluation of the marks in the statute of the University. The averments made in the petition is denied by the University but the University has not denied that the answer of question no. 4 which has been given by the petitioner is correct. The reply of paragraphs no. 9,10,11 and 12 has been given in paragraph 6 of the rejoinder affidavit. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. 6. Taking into consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the averments made in the petition as well as counter and rejoinder affidavit, it is not denied by the University that the answer has not been attempted correct by the petitioner, therefore the Court is of the view that in the interest of justice and future of student, the University is directed to revaluate the answer-sheet particularly the question no. 4 by the expert and award appropriate marks within two weeks from the WRIC No. 23726 of 2025 2 date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Thereafter, the University shall inform the result of the revaluation of the answer-sheet to the petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 Pratima WRIC No. 23726 of 2025 3 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad