1 2025:HHC:12824 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2895 of 2025 Date of Decision: 06.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Veena Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that present petition can be disposed of at this stage with the observation that same shall abide by the outcome of the LPA filed by the respondents-State in CWP No. 2274 of 2021 titled as Satya Devi Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. alongwith connected matters. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 06, 2025 (Sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?