PRADEEP SANTOSH PAWAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
IA/3789/2025 · 2025-11-28
Shri R M Joshi
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77084 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 77084 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
36-IA-3789-25 IN APEAL(ST)-20597-25.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3789 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.20597 OF 2025 Pradeep Santosh Pawar …. Applicant V/s. State Of Maharashtra And Anr …. Respondents ---- Mr.Priyal Sarda i/b Ms.Seema Dighe, for the Applicant. Mr.Mayur S. Sonavane, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr.Pramod M. Patil, PSI, Shivajinagar Police Station, Pune. ---- CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 28th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C:- . The learned APP makes statement that, Respondent No.2 is duly served. Absent.
2. Ms.Jahnavi S. Karnik, is appointed to represent Respondent No.2 in this proceeding.
3. This Application is for condonation of delay of 69 days in filing appeal, which in impugned order rejecting Application for bail in connection with the Crime No.171 of N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2025.11.28 18:09:02 +0530
36-IA-3789-25 IN APEAL(ST)-20597-25.doc 2023 registered with Shivajinagar Police Station.
4. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that, the Appellant is in jail, which has resulted in causing delay in filing of the Appeal.
5. The learned APP as well as learned counsel for Respondent No.2 opposed the Application.
6. The fact that, the Appellant/Applicant’s liberty is restricted, it becomes sufficient ground for delay condonation, hence, Application stands allowed.
7. The Appeal be registered.
8. The learned APP waives service for Respondent No.1-State.
9. Ms.Jahnavi S. Karnik, waives service for Respondent No.2.
10. By consent of both sides, stand over to 10th December
2025.
(R.M. JOSHI, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2