- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33770 WP No. 14803 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14803 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K.H. NARAYANAPPA, SON OF LATE. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, M-99164 22421 2. SMT. GOWRAMMA WIFE OF SRI. K.H. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT KARENAHALLI, 11TH DIVISION, 2ND WARD, DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S. VENUGOPALA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33770 WP No. 14803 of 2025 3. THE TAHASILDAR, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN CASE L.R.F RS (DO)24/2011-12, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner in proceedings bearing No.L.R.F:SR(Do):24/2011-12 dated 31.08.2018 at Annexure-A. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33770 WP No. 14803 of 2025 been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioners. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioners and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioners did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner. 5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority. 6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33770 WP No. 14803 of 2025 omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner. 7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33770 WP No. 14803 of 2025 Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioners herein. 8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioners including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 31.08.2018, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioners. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33770 WP No. 14803 of 2025 iv) The petitioners shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 18.09.2025, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 CT: BHK