Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77078 (BOM)

MR. ARUN SHETTY v. MRS. RADHIKA ARUN SHETTY

IA/17916/2023 · 2025-11-07

Kamal Khata

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

62-asao-917-2023+.doc Sumedh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.917 OF 2023 Arun Shetty ... Appellant V/s. Radhika Arun Shetty ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17916 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17065 OF 2023 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.917 OF 2023 _______________________ Mr. Mayur Mohite a/w. Adv. Jayesh Bhosale for the Appellant. Mr. Kamlesh Mali i/by Adv. Nishal Kolekar for the Respondent. _______________________ CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J. DATED : 7TH NOVEMBER 2025. P.C. : INTERIM APPLICATION NO.17916 OF 2023 1. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that in view of the Advocates ;ling of the Second Appeal instead of First Appeal, a delay of 107 days occured. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application and upon hearing the explanation advanced, I see no impediment in allowing the Application. 1/2 SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Digitally signed by SUMEDH NAMDEO SONAWANE Date: 2025.11.10 14:32:25 +0530 62-asao-917-2023+.doc 3. Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. List the Appeal from Order and connected Interim Application on 18th November 2025. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) 2/2