Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77074 (PNJ)

MAHANT RAJINDER KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/40114/2024 · 2025-05-22

Manjari Nehru Kaul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 207 MAHANT RAJINDER KUMAR TIWARI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case 23.07.2024 under Sections Section 13 of Punjab Travels Professional Regulation Act, 2014 at Police Station 2. compliance of order dated and cooperated with the investigating agency. 3. the order dated 22.01.2025, the sum of Rs.1.25 lakhs has been deposited before learned Chief Judicial Magi the receipt placed on record today. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: May 22 MAHANT RAJINDER KUMAR TIWARI Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Avtar Singh Khinda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab With ASI Mangal Singh. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case under Sections 420, 406 of the Section 13 of Punjab Travels Professional Regulation Act, 2014 at Police Station City Kapurthala, District Kapurthala Learned counsel for the petitioner has compliance of order dated 22.01.2025, the pe and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 22.01.2025, the sum of Rs.1.25 lakhs has been deposited before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapurthala, which is evident from the receipt placed on record today. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-40114-2024 Date of decision: May 22, 2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , Advocate Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.199 dated of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 13 of Punjab Travels Professional Regulation Act, 2014, registered District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1). Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in , the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 22.01.2025, the sum of Rs.1.25 lakhs has been deposited strate, Kapurthala, which is evident from ...Petitioner ...Respondent for dated and , registered that in titioner has joined investigation for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 22.01.2025, the sum of Rs.1.25 lakhs has been deposited strate, Kapurthala, which is evident from Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.23 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-40114 4. factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. 5. dated 22.01.2025, is m Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 40114-2024 Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order .2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order ade absolute subject to the conditions laid down in (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order ade absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.23 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh