Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7704 (MAD)

Lakshmi v. K Munirathinam

CMP/17631/2025 · 2026-07-03

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.17631 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.108334 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 186 days in preferring the above appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners. 3. Notice to first respondent is dispensed with since the first respondent remained ex parte before the Tribunal. 4. Though notice has been served on the second respondent and the name of the second respondent is also printed in the cause list, there is no appearance on behalf of the second respondent. 5. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 186 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned. 6. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission in due course. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for interest for the delay period in the event of enhancement of compensation. 03.07.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis