Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77036 (MAD)

D.Naresh Kumar v. Kumar Jayant, IAS., and 5 others

CONT P/2091/2023 · 2025-09-19

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 D.Naresh Kumar S/o.Doss, No.392/2, Sugar Mill Road, 24, Palayanur Village and Post, Madurantakkam Taluk, Chengalpattu District - 603 308. Petitioner Vs 1.Kumar Jayant, IAS., Addl. Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai - 600 009. 2.A.R.Raghul Nath District Collector, District Collector Office, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 3.B.Subanandhini District Revenue Officer, District Collector Officer Complex, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 4.A.Thigharajan Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurantakkam Taluk, Madurantakkam, Chengalpattu District. 5.S.Rajesh Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Madurantakkam Taluk, Madurantakkam, Chengalpattu District. 6.Jagavelli Revenue Officer, Office of the Revenue, Vaiyaur Circle, Vaiyaur Village and Post, Madurantakkam Taluk, Chengalpattu District. Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for intentional and willful disobedience caused by them to the order dated 21.02.2023 made in W.M.P.No.5007 of 2023 in W.P.No.4985 of 2023. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Dharani Dharan ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 For Respondents: Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar State Government Pleader assisted by Mr.T.K.Saravanan Addl. Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The contempt petition was filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 21.2.2023. 2. The order dated 13.9.2023 passed by this court shows that issuance of work order dated 5.6.2023 was a result of lack of communication and, subsequently, the work order was withdrawn on 12.9.2023. In that view of the matter, the present contempt petition is closed. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 19.09.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 sasi ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (sasi) Cont.P.No.2091 of 2023 19.09.2025 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis