Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 77033 (PNJ)

ARCHANA PANDEY v. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION HARYANA & ORS

CWP/767/2017 · 2025-08-12

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Archana Pandey State Information Commission CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. occasion, the instant writ petition was dismissed for non vide order dated 11.07.2017, but subject to payment of Rs.2000 as costs. again dismissed for non vide order dated 2. the last date of hearing, and the position 3. but to dismiss the 4. 12.08.202 Ak Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Archana Pandey Versus State Information Commission Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) A perusal of the record shows that , the instant writ petition was dismissed for non vide order dated 11.07.2017, but the same was subject to payment of Rs.2000 as costs. again dismissed for non-prosecution, vide order dated 20.12.2024, and vide order dated 05.07.2023, it was again None had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing, and the position remains the In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the instant petition for non- Dismissed for non-prosecution. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-767-2017 Date of decision: 12.08.2025 ….Petitioner Haryana and others ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. A perusal of the record shows that, even on an earlier , the instant writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution, the same was restored on 17.07.2017, subject to payment of Rs.2000 as costs. Whereafter, the petition was , vide order dated 20.12.2024, and again restored. one had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner on remains the same even today. this Court is left with no other option, -prosecution. prosecution. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 5 earlier prosecution, restored on 17.07.2017, , the petition was , vide order dated 20.12.2024, and one had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner on this Court is left with no other option, AMIT KUMAR 2025.08.18 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document