V.Madhu, v. The Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation, Rep. by
WP/28427/2012 · 2025-01-28
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7703 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7703 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010079562012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No:28427 OF 2012 Between: V.Madhu and two others.
…Petitioners AND A.P.TRANSCO Rep. by its Chairman & M.D., Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad and two others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Chandraiah Sunkara Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.Lakshma Reddy
Sri P.Anand Seshu
Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi
Ld. Standing Counsel
For APTRANSCO
The Court made the following order:
1. No representation for the petitioner.
2. The learned standing counsel for the respondents submits that the grievance of the petitioner is adequately
addressed by the respondents vide proceedings dated 15.12.2012 and placed the proceedings on record.
3. Recording the same, no further orders are required in this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________
JUSTICE HARINATH. N BV