IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK Niranjan Moharana (In BLAPL No.10610 of 2025) Sabir Khan (In BLAPL No.9291 of 2025) Puria @ Purusottam @ Purastam @ Paratama Bhujabala (In BLAPL No.9443 of 2025) Pintu Nayak and another (In BLAPL No.9637 of 2025) … Petitioners Mr. M. Acharya, Advocate (in BLAPL No.10610 of 2025) Mr. P.S. Das, Advocate (in BLAPL No.9291 of 2025) Mr. A.K. Mishra-3, Advocate (in BLAPL No.9443 of 2025) Mr. R. Barik, Advocate (in BLAPL No.9637 of 2025) -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. A. Pradhan, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 28.11.2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Since these four bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. These are the bail applications U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Nayagarh Sadar P.S. Case No.211 of 2025 corresponding to Spl. GR Case No.64 of 2025 pending in the file of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Nayagarh, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.21(b)/29 of NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 30Grams 16Mgs of Brown Sugar. 4. Heard, Mr. Manoranjan Acharya, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No.10610 of 2025; Mr. Partha Sarathi Das, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No.9291 of 2025; Mr. Aswini Kumar Mishra-3, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No. 9443 of 2025; Mr. Rabindranath Barik, learned counsel for the petitioners appearing virtually in BLAPL No. 9637 of 2025 and A. Pradhan, learned Addl. PP in these matters and perused the record. 5. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence as alleged against the petitioners vis-a- vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioners in custody since 18.08.2025 with framing of charge in the meantime and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, admits each of the petitioners to bail. 6. Hence, these four bail applications of the petitioners namely Niranjan Moharana (BLAPL No.10610 of 2025); Sabir Khan (BLAPL No.9291 of 2025); Puria @ Purusottam @ Purastam @ Paratama Bhujabala (BLAPL No.9443 of 2025) and Pintu Nayak & Suraj Nayak (BLAPL No. 9637 of 2025) are allowed and each of the petitioners is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 7. Accordingly, these BLAPLs stand disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge S.Sasmal Designation: Jr. Stenographer